The B-66B, unlike the RB-66B/C and WB-66D, did not have an ARC-21 HF capability. Later, when the B-66B was modified to the EB-66B configuration, the ARC-21/65 capability was incorporated and a long wire antenna was installed from a mast on the top of the fuselage (wing constant section) to the top of the vertical stabalizer. The wire antenna was required on the EB-66B because the B-66B/EB-66B did not have a vertical stabalizer isolation strip like the RB/WB-66 series aircraft (Top of vertical stabilizer was the HF antenna).
In the mid-1960 time era, 2 WB-66Ds were modified by Northrop to test a promising Laminar Flow Control system that was expected to result in a 50% increase in large aircraft range, payload and endurance. The modified B-66 Laminar Flow Control “Breathing Wing” used underwing compressors to inhale turbulent boundary air through paper-thin slots on top of the wings to provide Laminar Flow Control. The engines were moved to the tail of the aircraft where two GE XJ79-13 non-afterburning versions of the J79-3A engine were mounted on the aft fuselage. The performance of the modified aircraft was greatly enhanced, with flights well into the supersonic range. The program was scrapped since no one could come up with a solution to the razor-thin slots on top of the wing from becoming plugged with bugs, dirt and debris that were sucked out of the air by the compressors under the wings. The modified WB-66Ds tail numbers 55-408 and 55-410 were used in the Northrop Laminar Flow Control Project redesignated as the X-21As .
B-66 Ejection Seats The seats for the Douglas B-66 aircraft were built
by Aircraft Mechanic Inc..
Pictures show the
various front-end crew station seats. Some of the seats had a front/back adjustment
and were retracted prior to ejection. AIRCRAFT GENERAL by Cliff Parrott 1.) Each of the two (2) Allison J-71-13 engines had a 28 VDC generator and a 60 KVA, 200 VAC, 3 Phase, 400 Hz alternator installed. 2.)
No dynamotors were used in the B-66 power supply system. Step down 3.) The original B-66 AC Power System utilized a 40 KVA. 200VAC. 3 Phase, 400 Hz alternator. As the aircraft electronic systems "Grew", the 40 KVA alternator was replaced with the 60 KVA alternator. 4.) All models of the B-66 utilized ground supplied air to start the engines. During flight, the "Air Start" mode or "Crossover Start" from the operating engine was utilized to restart engines. COMMUNICATIONS by Cliff Parrott 1.) The RB-66B, RB-66C, WB-66D and the RB-66B and RB-66C aircraft modified to EB-66E and EB-66C configuration, had UHF and HF capability. An ARC-27 was used for UHF and the ARC/21 (Later the ARC-65) was used for HF. The original
B-66B had UHF (ARC-21) capability only. When some of the B- 2.) Trailing wire antennas were not used on the B-66 aircraft. The production RB-66B, RB-66C, WB-66D and the EB-66E and EB-66C had a wide isolation strip Insolation) incorporated about half way up the vertical stabalizer. The upper section of the vertical stabalizer was the HF antenna. The oiriginal B-66B aircraft did not have an HF capability and, therefore, did not have an isolation strip on the vertical stabalizer. When some of the B-66B aircraft were modified to the EB-66B Jammer configuration, an ARC-21/-65 HF Liaison communications system was installed. The antenna system for the Liaison radio was installed by a modification (T.O.). This consisted of a mast on the top of the fuselage just forward of the wing leading edge. A "Long Wire" antenna was then connected between the mast a point near the top of the vertical stabalizer leading edge. 3.) I have
obtained the following information, concerning pilot communication and potential
jammer interference, from a retired Air Force Electronic Warfare Officer who flew
100 EB-66C Electronic Warfare missions over North Vietnam. "There were communication jammers on the EB-66E - but as I recall, they were limited to VHF."
"The only possibility of communications interference by the jammers was | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||